Via: CUBANETMiriam LeivaLA HABANA, Cuba, 24 de febrero, www.cubanet.org -Orlando Zapata Tamayo murió el 24 de febrero a consecuencia de una huelga de hambre sostenida durante más de 80 días en reclamo del trato adecuado a su condición de prisionero de conciencia. Muchas otras realizó desde el 20 de marzo de 2003. Apresado durante la oleada represiva de la Primavera Negra, no estuvo incluido en los juicios sumarísimos a los 75, con condenas de hasta 28 años de cárcel. Sólo fue sentenciado a 3 años, pero no por bondad ni justicia. Debió haber sido excarcelado hace 4 años. En realidad nunca cometió delito, pues únicamente defendió el derecho a expresar sus ideas, reclamar la libertad de prisioneros políticos, procurar la prosperidad del pueblo cubano y amar la Patria.Desde su llegada a prisión, el sadismo del régimen más democrático y respetuosos de los derechos humanos en el mundo se ensañó con el joven negro, humilde, albañil y plomero, nacido el 15 de mayo de 1967. Celdas de castigo, golpizas y vejaciones no rompieron su dignidad. Acusaciones sucesivas dentro de la prisión produjeron juicios sin defensa, con condenas sumadas de 36 años al momento de ser asesinado. Pasó por varias prisiones por las protestas realizadas con otros presos de conciencia como él y prisioneros políticos, a pesar del aislamiento a que estaban sometidos.¡Qué en Cuba no se tortura, alardea el gobierno! ¿Acaso el trato cruel, la ausencia de atención médica, la falta de medicamentos, la mala alimentación, la escasa agua contaminada, la inexistente higiene, el hacinamiento con presos comunes de alta peligrosidad, los gritos, los insectos y roedores, no son torturas físicas? Estar enclaustrado en 2 por 3 metros sin ventana ni ventilación, con un hueco para hacer las necesidades vitales y un chorrito de agua, cuando la ponen, sin alimentos ni ropa, con humedad y frío o calor intensos según la época, parece exquisita tortura. La ausencia de cartas o llamadas telefónicas; no tener libros y periódicos ni con que escribir, complementan el régimen en las cárceles cubanas. La privación de visitas familiares como castigo, luego de muchos meses de espera, es habitual.Reyna Tamayo, la madre, ha recorrido Cuba de prisión en prisión. Demandó tratamiento humano para su hijo, atribulado y recio, a las autoridades de los penales, el Ministerio del Interior, el gobierno y el poder judicial. Se enteraba de los juicios realizados y las nuevas sentencias cuando ya se habían impuesto. Viajó miles de kilómetros en casi 7 años para llevar alimentos y ropa adquiridos con mucho esfuerzo, para regresar con la mayor parte porque le limitaban el peso o le cancelaban la visita. ¡Cuanta tortura a esa mujer cubana, humilde, negra; en un país, donde no hay discriminación racial y todos tenemos iguales derechos! A Orlando Zapata Tamayo lo trasladaron de Camagüey a La Habana, cuando ya expiraba. El clamor de la oposición pacífica, la solidaridad de los prisioneros de conciencia y políticos, así como las denuncias de la opinión pública internacional movieron a los ególatras totalitarios. Desde 2004 han procurado que no murieran en las cárceles con algunas licencias extrapenales o tratamiento médico en prisión antes de llegar al límite del desgaste total.Miguel Valdés Tamayo falleció el 9 de enero de 2007 en un hospital de La Habana por la dolencia cardíaca agravada en la cárcel. Había recibido la licencia meses antes. Fue el primer mártir de los 75. También era negro y humilde. Orlando fue sacado del Hospital Nacional de Reclusos de la Prisión de Máxima Seguridad Combinado del Este sólo horas antes hacia el publicitado Hospital Hermanos Amejeiras para que falleciera en una instalación civil del más elevado nivel, a la que no lo trasladaron oportunamente.La mayoría de los 53 reos de conciencia de los 75 que permanecen en prisión sufren serias enfermedades, contraídas allí. Muchos están amenazados de seguir la ruta de Miguel y Orlando. Hay alrededor de 200 prisioneros políticos, y Cuba ostenta el bochornoso cuarto lugar mundial por cantidad de presos: 531 por 100 000 habitantes.El genocidio, según el Articulo II, inciso b: Lesión grave a la integridad física o mental de los miembros del grupo, según la Convención de la ONU de 1948, está institucionalizado en Cuba. Fidel Castro atacó el Cuartel Moncada; hubo muchos muertos. Sólo cumplió 21 meses en una cárcel, donde se cocinaba langosta, fumaba tabaco, recibía visitas, libros y correspondencia; fue retratado y conversó con periodistas. Durante la dictadura de Fulgencio Batista, el Congreso lo amnistió.

DESPESISTAS E IRRESPONSÁVEISSão assim os nossos (tristes) governantes.Por acção ou omissão deixaram chegar a economia do país ao estado actual.Não contentes em esbanjar o dinheiro dos contribuintes em obras que quase só vão servir para encher os bolsos de alguns e ser no futuro um sorvedouro de verbas públicas (estradas desertas, aeroportos sem clientes, tgv's sem passageiros, etc, etc, etc) ainda se dão ao luxo, depois de conseguirem garantir que um (mau? péssimo?) orçamento seja aprovado, de fazer chantagem ameaçando com a demissão do governo.Os resultados estão à vista e os portugueses vão senti-los na pele muito em breve, quando começarem a ver o custo do crédito a trepar e ficarem ainda mais estrangulados financeiramente do que já estão. Isto para além de o serviço da dívida do país crescer, dificultando também qualquer recuperação.É este triste governo, que se consegue enganar nas contas do défice num ponto percentual apenas de um mês para o outro, que promete que a partir de 2011 é que vai haver rigor e que vai atingir 3% de défice em 2013. É este governo, sem qualquer credibilidade, dados os sucessivos falhanços das suas políticas e das suas previsões que se dá ao luxo de criticar entidades externas que avisam que assim é impossível continuar.Com a actuação irresponsável (sancionada eleitoralmente por uma fatia significativa de eleitores) de uns senhores capitaneados por José Sócrates, Teixeira dos Santos e Vítor Constâncio , Portugal atingiu hoje a deplorável posição de 14º no ranking dos países com maior risco de dívida, no mundo!E se não bastasse toda a incompetência e irresponsabilidade que têm deixado como marca idelével da sua actuação, ainda têm a suprema lata de se fazerem de vítimas de tudo e de todos e de acusar os outros - oposição (que não é muito melhor, a bem dizer), agências de rating, comissário europeu, mercados e investidores, de perseguição!Face a tudo isto, só há duas hipóteses:1) Fugir do país para bem longe de onde estão estas aventesmas. Mas só alguns podem e/ou têm coragem de o fazer.2) A REVOLTA.Eu, opto claramente pela segunda hipótese. Recuso terminantemente que por culpa destes senhores e dos que nos têm governado nos ultimos anos, a Soberania de Portugal esteja mais uma vez colocada em causa. Recuso o fatalismo de ter um governo incapaz de atacar de frente os problemas estruturais da economia portuguesa.Recuso que num período extremamente difícil para Portugal, se assista de manhã à noite a uma gincana política entre governo e oposição, como se o momento não fosse gravíssimo.Recuso abdicar do meu direito e dever de cidadania, de apontar o que está mal e propor soluções.Recuso um país onde a corrupção e o compadrio começam a ser a norma.Recuso tudo isto. E não me calo.
Via: IRANIAN.comby Setareh Sabety These are both tense and exciting times in Iran and amongst the opposition abroad. In the build-up to 22 Bahman[1] which is yet another chance for the Green movement to use the cover of official demonstrations to come out en-mass to protest, the regime is showing signs of uncharacteristic and newfound anxiety. In what is believed by many to be an attempt to deter a repeat of the widespread and vociferous Ashura demonstrations, two young men who were defendants in the regimes post-election Stalinist trails have been executed and eleven more have been charged, five for being a Mohareb, a warrior against God, which is punishable by death. As though the execution of the two innocent young men was not enough, Jannati, last Fridays prayer leader, asked the judiciary to hasten the execution of more Moharebs. This hard-line Ayatollah, cursed with the illogic of the petrified, used verses from the Koran in order to justify the hangings. Jannati, in this way, sealed the sure repulsion-from-Islam of those urbanites that still may have held a soft spot in their heart for their ancestral religion. The gun-toting Hojjat-al-Islam of Ouroomieh, Hassani, who has a fetish for exposing his weapons in public, revived the medieval notion of punishment by suggesting the parading of the bodies of the executed on the streets of Tehran to put fear into the hearts of all the other Moharebs and dissenters. On the international front, the more secular and educated foreign minister Manuchehr Mottaki announced on Farid Zakarias show that the protesters were a violent minority who had not been targeted by the basij and the security forces but who had themselves fired guns, burned buildings and killed people.[2] Mottakis performance was so lame compared to his firm and fair interlocutor that Farid Zakaria would win a majority of Iranian votes if free elections were to be held today. Regime mouth piece Professor Marandi of Tehran University in his perfect mid-western accented English blamed the executed nineteen and twenty-some year olds for their own execution. The Senate passed sanctions against Iran which would have provoked much hatred a year ago but instead sparked a rapprochement between Iranian opposition groups and Senator McCain. The Senator whose video showing him holding Neda Aghasoltans picture and eloquently pleading the cause of Iranian Greens made it to all opposition sites and made us forget, for a moment, his bomb Iran image. Many still oppose sanctions, especially Iranian-Americans and those on the left who have rightfully come to hate AIPAC and the neo-cons and cannot fathom that maybe, this once we share common interest with those much hated monsters on the Hill![3] Some find this hatred greater than their desire for a quicker resolution to the internal crises facing the people of Iran. The opposition disagrees with each other on many issues yet the disagreements should not be seen as sources of division but as signs of democratic maturity. It is almost as if the opposition has come to see that they can unite under the love of the right to disagree! The troika of Reform (Khatami, Mousavi and Karoubi) disappointed us once again with a too little and too guarded response. This time even the popular Karoubi minced words regarding whether or not he accepted the Supreme Leader as the leader. But Zahra Rahnavard stepped in to save the day, declaring that the reformist opposition had no intention of backing down showing us once again that women in this traditional society have more guts.[4] Once again the movement hijacked the reformist leaders and corrected their lackluster performance. A declaration by Karoubi and Mousavi expressing regret towards the executions was widely disseminated as condemning the executions.[5] Hush, let us put up with them until we get there then will impose our true wishes, seemed to be the unspoken refrain of a movement that was from the start much more radical than its hesitant leaders! In times of tension and disappointment people pump hope into the Green movement. The mourning mothers joined the family of the imprisoned outside of Evin gates last Saturday. A crowd of two thousand demonstrated and cheered the prisoners that were being released.[6] The pressure from the crowd was such that reportedly much more than the promised twenty-three prisoners were released. In Rome, Rotterdam and Geneva Greens interrupted IR sponsored concerts and events.[7] In most cities candle-light vigils were held for the executed. Online, the activity of cyber warriors has doubled, everyone feeling the urgency to act-- to give one last push to this unwanted and feared regime. The cherry on top of the icing of recent protests were reports yesterday of the Iranian Ambassador being roughly handled by the French gendarmes after he had tried to attack some demonstrators. This was cheered by the opposition who saw in this minor incident much symbolism and justice.[8] In Neuphle le Chateau, where Khomeini held his last court in exile thirty-one years ago, his ambassador was humiliated by the French police. The same police who had protected the opposition in 78 now protected the Greens who had come to this quiet little town, where a commemorative event was planned by the embassy, to protest against the Iranian regime. The Islamic Revolution, it seemed, had come full circle to where it first gained stature in order to lose it. Despite numerous warnings of the Greens demise due to lack of leadership or working class following, the chaotic, multifaceted opposition movement keeps surprising everyone, ourselves included. It reminds one of an Iranian picnic where no one really organizes anything but everyone brings food and good will to make, in the end and despite much pandemonium, a great feast. In fact the resilience of the movement is such that it has made experts try to revise theories of revolutions and uprisings. In many ways it is a first: it is a first movement of a middle-class Muslim society against its Islamist leaders; it is a first counter revolutionary uprising coming a good thirty years after the revolution; it is the first YouTube uprising, the first Twitter revolution and the first Facebook struggle. What makes this movement so inspiring is its refusal to die even when faced with the increasing brutality of a formidable and heartless enemy. The first great Islamic revolution is now facing the first great anti-Islamist uprising. It is the first leaderless revolution which also lacks ideology or even a clear-cut agenda. It is the first revolution that does not need leadership nor ideology because it is fueled by a basic, unrelenting need for freedom and justice that is so strong it is self-correcting and self-propelling! This is not just a civil rights movement; this is not merely a reform movement. This is a new kind of Revolution. It is a mature Revolution one that mistrusts leaders and isms one that knows what it wants but refuses to make a religion out of it. It is a struggle that wants freedom in its purest most individual sense. It is a reform movement that wants to replace lies with candor; corruption with accountability and state monopoly and mafia economics with a free and fair market. It is a revolution that demands a democracy that does not translate into the tyranny of the masses. It is a revolution of those who recently tasted the bitterness of a revolution that did not answer their needs or fulfill their dreams. NOTES [1] Anniversary of the Islamic Revolution of 79 [2] YouTube.com. Last viewed Jan 31, 2010. [3] InsideIran.org: Iran: Sanction, or Not? Hossien Askaris gives the most thorough defense of the need for economic sanctions. Mahmood Delkhasteh argues against any intervention. I agree with the former. I think that Iran is not Iraq so sanctions can work at this point I also think that we are in a post imperialist world were Iran is no longer threatened with imperialist aspirations of superpowers and we have reached a maturity as a nation were we will not mistake aid for intervention. [4] Fereshteh Ghazi very vocal Green activist/journalist interviewed Rahnavard for Roozonline. [5] Facebook: Mousavi and Karoubi Condemned Recent Executions. Last viewed Jan. 30, 2010. [6] Persian2English.com: More than 2000 people gather outside Evin tonight [7] Iranian.com: Greens interrupt concert. Last viewed Jan. 31, 2010. [8] Iranian.com: Mehdi Mir Abu Talebi
QUADRO DE HONRA